Search results

II"), the respondents could no longer rely on an adequacy decision ("Privacy Shield") under Article 45 GDPR for a data transfer to the US. The first respondent

23The Swedish Privacy Agency Diary number: DI-2020-11373 3(23) Date: 2023-06-30 The Privacy Protection Authority's decision The Privacy Protection Authority

legal basis, since the CJEU has invalidated the decision on the "EU-US Privacy Shield" in the ruling C-311/18 ("Schrems II"), and the controller can no longer

24The Swedish Privacy Agency Diary number: DI-2020-11368 3(24) Date: 2023-06-30 The Privacy Protection Authority's decision The Privacy Protection Authority

25The Swedish Privacy Agency Diary number: DI-2020-11397 3(25) Date: 2023-06-30 The Privacy Protection Authority's decision The Swedish Privacy Protection

27The Swedish Privacy Agency Diary number: DI-2020-11370 3(27) Date: 2023-06-30 The Privacy Protection Authority's decision The Swedish Privacy Protection

44 ff GDPR. After the European Court of Justice declared the "EU-US Privacy Shield" with the decision of 16.07.2020, C-311/18 (Schrems II) declared invalid

international transfer of data to the U.S., the controller was using the Privacy Shield Certificate until the latter was declared invalid and subsequently the

since the Schrems II judgement, controllers could no longer rely on the Privacy Shield adequacy decision. The DPA held that the controllers breached Article

highlighting 3 elements: [REDACTED] There is 1 case pending on the Privacy Shield before the General Court and one case on the SCCs (“Schrems II”) before

adequacy of the protection provided by the European Union-United States Privacy Shield, without maintain its effects. 5. In the absence of another relevant

Commision, in turn based on the transatlantic legal framework known as 'Privacy Shield'. Nevertheless, after C-311/18 (“Schrems II”), the Commission’s adequacy

Group LLC is certified under the Privacy Shield Agreement, which provides a guarantee of compliance with the Privacy Shield (https://wwwvivðcyshietd.gov/participant

under Article 44 et seqq. GDPR. As the CJEU invalidated the “EU-U.S. Privacy Shield” decision in the Schrems II judgment, Telenor can no longer base the

protection is not guaranteed in the USA because the EU-US adequacy decision (“Privacy Shield”) following the ECJ ruling in the “Schrems II” case (judgment of July

the own privacy policy published at the following electronic address https://web.respondus.com/gdpr-privacy-shield/, to adhere to the Privacy Shield ", in

information provided in the policies of privacy, redirecting users to the Legal Notice in the privacy policy privacy for the identification of the person

special categories of personal data are involved) and the level of any privacy intrusion”; e “the number of individuals affected, the extent of any exposure