Search results

Category:Article 97 GDPR Kühling, Raab, in Kühling, Buchner, GVO BDSG, Article 97 GDPR, margin numbers 1-3 (C. H. Beck 2020, 3rd edition). In the latter case

enforcement of the GDPR. → You can find all related decisions in Category:Article 59 GDPR Selmayr, in Ehmann, Selmayr, DS-GVO Kommentar, Article 59 GDPR, margin number

Regulation (GDPR), Article 68 GDPR, p. 1059 (Oxford University Press 2020); Brink, Wilhelm, in Wolff, Brink, DS-GVO, Article 69 GDPR, margin numbers 4-6 (C.H

edition). Körffer in Paal, Pauly, DS-GVO BDSG, Article 71 GDPR, margin numbers 4 (C.H. Beck 2021, 3rd edition). Dix in Kühling, Buchner, GDPR BDSG, Article

under the GDPR. → You can find all related decisions in Category:Article 94 GDPR Kühling, Raab, in Kühling, Buchner, GVO BDSG, Article 94 GDPR, margin numbers

all related decisions in Category:Article 31 GDPR Hartung, in Kühling, Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, Article 31 GDPR, margin numbers 1-4 (Beck 2020, 3rd edition)

as profiling (see also Article 4(4) GDPR); Restriction (marking for limited further processing, see also Article 4(3) GDPR), such as deactivation of information

Member State law under Article 6(4) GDPR; further processing based on the data subject's consent under Article 6(4) GDPR and further processing for a compatible

which violates the GDPR. Article 4(12) of the GDPR clarifies that the regulation applies specifically in cases of personal data breaches. In such breaches,

compatible with the eliminated purpose” under Article 6(4) GDPR. Art 6(4) GDPR establishes that, in order for the controller to determine whether processing

to Article 60 GDPR, Article 61 GDPR, Article 62 GDPR, Article 63 GDPR, Article 64 GDPR, Article 65 GDPR, Article 66 GDPR and Article 56 GDPR. The SA is also

Article 32 GDPR, margin numbers 23 (Manz 2022). Pollirer, in Knyrim, DatKomm, Article 32 GDPR, margin numbers 23 (Manz 2022). Pollirer, in Knyrim, DatKomm

(available here). Bygrave, in Kuner, Bygrave, Docksey, The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A Commentary, Article 25 GDPR, p. 576 (Oxford University

Regulation. National identification numbers (NIN) or identifiers of general application as understood in Article 87 GDPR are numbers used by public authorities

is intended to be, stored in a filing system. The term 'processing' is defined, and further discussed, in Article 4(2) GDPR. In general, processing includes

specialis in relation to the GDPR - usually in the form of a Restriction under Article 23 GDPR - these other rights exist in parallel to the GDPR. This means

(Article 15 GDPR), rectification (Article 16 GDPR), erasure (Article 17 GDPR), restriction (Article 18 GDPR), notification (Article 19 GDPR) or data portability

on Article 6(1)(e) and (f) GDPR, “including profiling based on those provisions.” Profiling is defined in Article 4(4) GDPR as a form of automated processing

80 sentence 5 GDPR. Ziebarth, in Sydow, Europäische Datenschutzgrundverordnung, Article 4 GDPR, margin number 204 (Nomos 2018). Klabunde, in Ehmann, Selmayr

toimisto in Finnish or Dataombudsmannens byrå in Swedish) is the national Data Protection Authority for Finland. It resides in Helsinki and is in charge

Article 6(1)(4) GDPR, as illustrated by the rules in Articles 4(11), 7 or 8 GDPR, as well as Recital 43. If consent is "freely given" under the GDPR requires

please refer to Article 51(1) GDPR and Article 52 GDPR in this Commentary. Article 54(1)(b) GDPR echoes Article 53(2) GDPR, which outlines the qualificatory

categories of data established in Article 9(2)(a) GDPR, Article 9(2)(c) GDPR, Article 9(2)(g) GDPR and Article 9(2)(i) GDPR directly correlate with a specific

related decisions in Category:Article 95 GDPR Costa de Oliveira in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 95 GDPR, p. 1296 (Oxford

exclude all sanctions mentioned in Chapter VIII GDPR, i.e. the damages under Article 82 GDPR and fines under Article 83 GDPR. In any case, should fines for

decisions in Category:Article 78 GDPR Tambou, in Simitis, Hornung, Spiecker gen. Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 78 GDPR, margin numbers 3 and 7 (C

n Recital 121 GDPR. Hijmans, in Kuner, Bygrave, Docksey, The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A Commentary, Article 53 GDPR, p. 888 (Oxford

listed in Article 83(4), (5) and (6) GDPR. This specifically refers to violations of Articles 8, 11, 25 to 39, 41(4), 42, 43 of the GDPR (paragraph 4), Articles

of the GDPR enforcement across the Member States. → You can find all related decisions in Category:Article 64 GDPR Caspar in Kühling, Buchner, GDPR Article

requirements set forth in Article 12 GDPR. Dix in Simitis, Hornung, Spiecker gen. Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 34 GDPR, margin numbers 8-9 (C.H. Beck 2019)

from any of the GDPR’s protections. → You can find all related decisions in Category:Article 39 GDPR Just as Article 38 GDPR, Article 39 GDPR also shows similarities

all related decisions in Category:Article 70 GDPR Schiedermair in Simitis et al., Data Protection Law, Article 70 GDPR, margin numbers 6-8 (C.H. Beck 2019

under Article 65(3)(1) GDPR and for consistency decisions in the urgency procedure under Article 66(4) GDPR is necessary, as these are in this respect backward

Belisario, GDPR e normativa privacy – Commentario, Article 90 GDPR, p. 662 (Wolters Kluwer 2018). Piltz in Gola DS-GVO, Article 90 GDPR, margin numbers 6-7 (C

controller (as defined under Article 4(7) GDPR) and a processor (as defined under Article 4(8) GDPR). As noted above, Article 79 GDPR imposes a two-stage cumulative

activity in question. → You can find all related decisions in Category:Article 80 GDPR Leupold, Schrems in Knyrim, Der Datkomm, Article 80 GDPR, margin

(Article 52(4)(5)(6) GDPR). Elements of SAs' complete independence are also addressed in Article 53 GDPR and Article 54 GDPR. The CJEU in the Case of Commission

response under Article 12(4) GDPR. There is no definition of the term “manifestly ... excessive” in the GDPR. The example in the law “in particular because of

19 GDPR. → You can find all related decisions in Category:Article 18 GDPR The right to restriction of processing was introduced in 2016 by the GDPR although

decisions in Category:Article 55 GDPR Hijmans, in Kuner, Bygrave, Docksey, The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A Commentary, Article 55 GDPR, p

established in 2001. It resides in Riga and is in charge of enforcing GDPR in Latvia.  The DVI is functionally independent institution. Besides GDPR, the regulation

BDSG, Article 75 GDPR, margin number 6 (C.H. Beck 2020, 3rd edition). Brink, Wilhelm, in BeckOK DatenschutzR, Article 75 GDPR, margin numbers 8-9 (C.H. Beck

of the GDPR. Article 10 GDPR is intended to extend the protection of the GDPR to the processing of certain criminal data that is not included in the scope

66(1)-(2) GDPR is the CSA within the meaning of Article 4(22) GDPR. In contrast, Article 66(3) refers to “any supervisory authority” (Article 4(21) GDPR) and

decisions in Category:Article 93 GDPR Herbst in Kühling, Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, Article 93 GDPR, margin number 1 (C.H. Beck 2020, 3rd Edition). Ehmann, in Ehman

of Article 4(7) and (8) GDPR can be liable for compensation. A claim for damages first requires an infringement of the GDPR. Article 82 GDPR does not contain

to damage referred to in Article 62(4) GDPR. According to Article 62(7) GDPR, if the lead SA does not invite the SA to take part in the joint operations

is subject, under Article 6(1)(c) GDPR. In line with the general objectives of the GDPR, as outlined in Article 1 GDPR Article 16 TFEU, SAs are also required

as listed in Articles 13 GDPR. In certain cases, Article 23 GDPR may be used by Member States to exempt certain duties under Article 13 GDPR in certain situations

Article 14 GDPR gives expression to the principle of transparency enshrined in Article 5(1)(a) GDPR and further defined in Article 12 GDPR. While Article

business 'in accordance with community law' - not in violation of community law (such as the GDPR). While there is no general balancing test, the GDPR foresees

guidance on Article 85 GDPR can be found in the case-law of the ECtHR. See, Tinnefeld in Kühling, Buchner, GDPR BDSG, Article 85 GDPR, margin number 9 (C

access (Article 15 GDPR), rectification (Article 16 GDPR), erasure (Article 17 GDPR), restriction of processing (Article 18 GDPR), notification obligation

mentioned in paragraph 1. In other words, the examples provided in paragraph 3 are helpful in understanding the relevant risk indicators for the GDPR, which

Article 4(7) GDPR (definition of controller), Article 4(8) GDPR (definition of processor), Article 4(16) GDPR (definition of main establishment), Article

carried out in compliance with the GDPR. Article 28(3)(h) GDPR enables such a task in case processors are used. According to Article 28(3)(h) GDPR, the processor

controller qualifies as controller (Article 4(7) GDPR) and Google LLC as processor (Article 4(8) GDPR) for data processing in connection with Google Analytics. Furthermore

Lit a GDPR or Article 6 GDPR or GDPR Article 6, Sec 1(a) Recitals are also not shortened. Example: Recital 47 Example: Not R 47 or Recital 47 GDPR Other

protection authorities (Art. 78.1 GDPR), as well as by the possibility to bring actions directly in court (Art. 79 GDPR). Against the decisions that put

In the opinion of AG Bobek, data such as phone number and car chassis number must be considered as personal data in the sense of Article 4(1) GDPR when

(i.e. the differentiation of the numbers existed, in these cases, in the last two digits of the calling numbers). In one case, the complaint concerned

meaning of Article 4(7) GDPR. Furthermore, the erasure or destruction of personal data is a form of processing based on Article 4(2) GDPR. The DPA has the

GCP in in combination with article 83 par. 5 of the GCC, and with article 21 par. 1 lit. b 'of Law 2472/1997, in combination with article 13 par. 4 of law

even pseudonymised data (Art. 4 Para. 5 GDPR) from the term personal data are recorded in accordance with Art. 4 Para. 1 GDPR. It is undeniable that the MB

protection of Art. 82 GDPR does not cover violations of Art. 13, 14, 15, 24, 25 and Art. 34 GDPR. In addition, there is no breach of the GDPR by the defendant

juris; Klar/Kühling: in: Kühling/Buchner, DS-GVO/BDSG, 2nd ed., Art. 4 DS-GVO marginal 8; Ernst, in: Paal/Pauly, DS-GVO/BDSG, 2nd ed., Art. 4 marginal 14). 39

the GEOPORTAL2 was not in line with the principle of lawfulness in Article 5(1)(a) GDPR, as none of the conditions of Article 6 GDPR were satisfied. The data

6(1)(a) and 4(11) GDPR in a case concerning the requirements of consent). Always use the most specific sub-paragraph (e.g. Article 6(1)(a) GDPR for consent

relative numbers were included in the Company's denial black list; e) in the black list used by the partner XX Srl there were almost 200,000 numbers that did

Article 28(1) GDPR by allowing 84 Danish municipalities to wrongfully gain access to the social security numbers and employment information of 4.2 million

Article 32 GDPR in ten cases. Meanwhile, Zitatel was found to be in violation of Article 5(1) GDPR and Article 32 GDPR in two cases. With regards to Teleraise

things. (6) In the situation in question, children's personal identification numbers are not intended to be used for the purposes listed in paragraph 38

referred to in Section 29.4 of the Data Protection Act, in which the personal identification number should not be entered unnecessarily. In addition to

account numbers. As a result, the DPA issued a reprimand to the controller in accordance with Article 58(2)(b) GDPR. Pursuant to Article 58(2)(d) GDPR, the

by e-mail. 1.4.4. With reference to the disputes referred to in points 4) and 5), in the initiation of the procedure it was noted that, in relation to the

checked whether the calling numbers indicated by the claimant in his claim are recorded in our database of telephone numbers that use our collaborators

calls to be made to the numbers included in the list of ADHD as well as in the internal Robinson List. In view of the above, my client understands that

awarded to an attorney at law salary. 4 The decision The court 4.1. Declares [the applicant]'s application inadmissible; 4.2. orders [the applicant] to pay

protection breach resulting in the need to notify the authority and the data subjects, according to Article 33(1) GDPR and Article 34(1) GDPR? The PUODO held that

November 2017 for complete numbers (i.e. for more than 13 months) and since 9 July 2014 for truncated numbers (i.e. for more than 4 years). However, the registration

of facts in a number of respects. In so far as relevant, the Court of Appeal will take this into account in the following. In this case - in so far as

persons responsible or in charge listed in paragraph 1 commit any of the offences referred to in Articles 72 to 74 of this Organic Law. In the present case,

personal data (health data under Article 4(15 GDPR) and consisted of the patients' names and social security numbers, excerpts from patient letters, medical

institutions) in this specific case outweigh the interests or the fundamental rights and freedoms of the data subject (recital 69 GDPR ). 4.4. This assessment

following sanctions, resulting in a record fine of € 8 125 000: - A € 4 000 000 fine for the infringement of Article 28 GDPR: due to the hiring of processors

obligation mentioned in the Art. 14 GDPR. 4) No, in the assessment of the President of UODO, sending out information related to Art. 14 GDPR by regular mail

obligations under Articles 24 and 32 of the GDPR which led to the personal data breach, as per Article 4(12) of the GDPR, including with regards to the complainant’s

purposes? 4) Is the data subjects’ consent valid? The HDPA found that: 1) The telephone number constitutes personal data according to Article 4(1) GDPR as the

complainant contained in a procedural document; in particular, a page of the procedural documents is taken up in which the claimant appears in a frontal position

Misdemeanor Court in Zagreb ruled that municipal wardens have a valid legal basis under Article 6 GDPR to collect and process vehicle registration numbers. The legal

mobile phone numbers of contacts who do not use the app. In order to do so, it must first assess whether the holders of the mobile phone numbers in the address

Article 48(1) LGT, Article 21 GDPR in link with Article 23 LOPDGDD and Article 28 GDPR? The Spanish DPA (AEPD) held that the facts in question indicated a breach

000 under Article 58(2) GDPR and Article 83(4) GDPR for the breach of Article 32(2), Article 32(4) GDPR and Article 28(3) GDPR. As for the controller,

provider, was processing personal data, in line with the definition of Article 4(1) GDPR. In accordance with Article 5(3) GDPR, the controller had an obligation

control with reference number [...], in order to prevent its implementation in the scope indicated in points 1-5 and in point 6 (with regard to technical

04/25/2018 in which he makes these declarations: - That in a bank account of which he is the owner in the entity CAIXABANK, (number ended in the digits

[plaintiff] states - in brief - that, in view of the current facts, ABN AMRO's interests in maintaining the coding do not outweigh its interest in removing it.

privacy. In addition, the excel files contained social security numbers 4 which are considered to be particularly personal data. The information in e- the

which the agent contacted in a personal capacity the complainant does not belong to VODAFONE, i.e. it is not listed in the numbers assigned to the ATENTO

to secrecy in accordance with Section 1 Paragraph 1 of the GDPR by not observing the principles in accordance with Articles 5 and 6 of the GDPR. The complaint

the data breach within the time limits set out in Article 34 of the GDPR (Article 83(2)(h) of the GDPR). In view of the above, it is not considered that

exercising their right to access (Article 15 GDPR), not mentioning any of the elements of Article 14 GDPR regarding the processing of data, but only mentioning

a person's behavior can be obtained by profiling, as referred to in art. 4 pts 4 GDPR. However, as part of our activities, we do not conduct profiling

personal data in question was not covered by the Public Administration Act. As such, the municipality did not have a legal basis cf. Article 6 GDPR. In addition

collection of Tax Identification Numbers is neither necessary nor appropriate for determining the reliability of an entity, in terms of customs law, and the

document with a digital signature. In light of these facts, Italy’s DPA found Vodafone S.p.A in violation of the following GDPR provisions: Article 5(1) and

of up to 4 % of the total annual turnover of the previous financial year, whichever is greater, in accordance with Article 83.5 of the RGPD. In accordance

the same. c. That in those cases in which a high risk could be observed one or more exceptions from those contained in art. 3. 4 GDPR. In this sense, those

because there are more telephone numbers in Austria than residents and virtual telephone numbers can also be generated in the app for verification, then

Article 13 of the GDPR GDPR. The form used violated Article 13 of the GDPR conduct that is subsumi- ble under Article 83(5) of the GDPR, which provides:

35(7) GDPR, for not complying with the principle of transparency under Article 5(1) GDPR and for not anonymising the data under Article 25(1) GDPR, among

provisions mentioned in point 4, to giving its interpretation of the provisions of the regulation of 27 April 2016 mentioned in point 3 in as regards the modalities

to in paragraphs 4, 5 and 6 are, in each case, effective, proportionate and dissuasive", before specifying the elements to be taken into account in deciding

of “names and addresses” in Article 8(2)(a) Directive 2004/48 which is not defined in that directive and has been implemented in the § 101(3)(1) of the German

needed in such a case. Furthermore, some of the data subjects had submitted requests to the controller regarding exercising their rights under GDPR. The

under 6.3.2 (part 1, in marginal numbers 22.-24.), 6.4.2 (part 2, in marginal numbers 26.-32.), 6.5.2 (subpart 3.1, in marginal numbers 34.-39.) and 6.5.3

registered on the Robinson List in breach of Article 48(1)(b) LGT and Article 21 GDPR in conjunction with Article 23(4) LOPDGDD. Avilon Center SL made

with a finepublic, as indicated in article 77.1. c) and 2. 4. 5. and 6. of the LOPDDGG: “ 1. Theregime established in this article will be applicable to

reasonableness and fairness. In the given circumstances [applicant] is in this case admissible in his application. assessment framework 4.4. The right of access

32 GDPR). In that respect, CNIL imposed a fine of 250,000 euros and called SPARTOO SAS to bring its processing activities in conformity with GDPR in a

the data controller to bring the processing operations in line with the provisions of the GDPR in accordance with Article 58 (2) (d). Share blogs or news

referred to in paragraphs 4, 5 and 6 of this Article are effective, proportionate and dissuasive in each individual case (paragraph 1). In accordance with

requirements of the GDPR; Because from Recital 171 Sentence 2 GDPR, from Art. 4 No. 2 GDPR and Art. 24 Para. 1, in particular Sentence 2 GDPR, the obligation

category of personal data covered by the breach in question, in the form of PESEL numbers, series and numbers of ID cards, names and surnames, address of residence

controller. In the case at issue, such processing should also be considered in violation of the GDPR. In particular, the DPA held that in any case, the

infringement; h) the way in which the supervisory authority learned of the infringement, in particular if the person in charge or the person in charge notified

of Article 32(1)(b) GDPR and Article 32(1)(d) GDPR and of the principle of accountability as foreseen in Article 5(2) GDPR read in conjunction with Article

whether the person who parked the vehicle in the parking lot was entitled to park the vehicle in the parking lot in question. The controller has considered

this possible. The vulnerability in Zoo's log-in allowed us to try to find a valid log-in (username and password), which in turn gave unauthorized access

personal data, approved by resolution no. 98 of 4/4/2019, published in G.U. no. 106 of 8/5/2019 and in www.gpdp.it, web doc. no. 9107633 (hereinafter "Regulation

February 4, 2019; Having regard to the written observations filed by the company SERGIC on March 4, 2019 ; Having regard to the observations in response

through a specialized cyber team, without any results in the deep neither in the dark web, and (4) due to the huge volume of affected subjects, the data

they comply with the provisionscurrent in the matter.C / Jorge Juan, 6www.aepd.es28001 - Madridsedeagpd.gob.es Page 4 4/8Only the community of owners, once

provided for in Article 56(1), read in conjunction with Article 56(2), read in conjunction with Article 56(3), read in conjunction with Article 56(4), read in

concerning events in the city centre. As such, the DPA held that the recordings captured personal data pursuant to Article 4(1) GDPR. Since the controller

as evidence in court proceedings under Article 6(1)(f) GDPR as the legitimate interest in doing so outweighed the data subject's interest in keeping his

infringement; h) the way in which the supervisory authority learned of the infringement, in particular if the person in charge or the person in charge notified

Article 9(2) GDPR and the conditions for consent pursuant to Article 4(11) GDPR had to be assessed in light of the relevant circumstances in which the consent

emails sent in connection with messages in respectively. Krifa Box and Secure @ Mail. In the case of an advisory email about new e-mail in Secure @ Mail

first time in the e-mail of [...] February 2020 addressed by AM to e. In a similar case, as of [...] February 2020. He mentioned in it that in connection

78(2) GDPR defines the applicable time frame in line with Article 4:13(1) of the Dutch Administrative law. The reason for not putting a deadline in the law

registered (customers) pursuant to GDPR art. 34? It follows from GDPR art. 34 that Nemlig and Intervare as data controllers in case of security breach is obliged

Regulations on the Use of Citizen Service Numbers in Healthcare ('Regeling gebruik burgerservicenummer in de zorg') read in conjunction with the Act on Additional

from users of “*** APPLICATION.1”.m) In fact, certain numbers in the public numbering plan are included bydefect in said "black list" (091, 061, 112, 092

margin no. 50). According to Art. 4 No. 15 GDPR in conjunction with recital. 35, second sentence of the GDPR, also numbers, symbols or labels that have been

and surname and only four NIF numbers, the rest of the numbers were hidden with an asterisk in the random. In our case, in the same way, when publishing

is typified in article 83.4.a) of the aforementioned GDPR in the following terms: "4. Violations of the following provisions will be penalized, according

namely Article 5(1)(f) GDPR, and thus, it did not comply with Article 5(2) GDPR referred as the principle of "proactive responsibility". In addition, it claimed

controller relied on Article (6)(1)(b) GDPR and Article 6(1)(c) GDPR as legal basis affects the holding of the DPA since in PS/00126/2021 the Spanish DPA held:

the RGPD, typified in article 83.5 of the GDPR, with a warning. -For an infringement of Article 25 of the RGPD, typified in article 83.4 of the RGPD, with

also stated in the decision. [The equivalent GDPR Article to Article 48(3)(a) EU GDPR is Article 46(3)(a) GDPR, and Article 50(1)(d) EU GDPR is Article

of Booking is located in Amsterdam. 1 See section 3.4.2 in this respect. 3.2 Processing of personal data According to Article 4(1) of the AVG, personal

erase personal data in accordance with Article 17(1) of the GDPR, except for the exceptions referred to in Article 17(3) of the GDPR.In this case, the deletion

cards" showing masked numbers (except the last 4 digits) of a debit card. THIRD: In view of the facts denounced in the claim and the documents provided by

of the GDPR, articles: -12 of the GDPR, in accordance with article 83.5.b) of the GDPR and 72.1.k) of the LOPDGDD, and -5.1.c) of the GDPR, in accordance

affected provided for in articles 12 must be fulfilled and 13 of the GDPR, and 22 of the LOPDGDD, in the terms already indicated. 4.- Images of the public

party in administrative criminal proceedings before the data protection authority in connection with the above-mentioned preliminary proceedings. In any

Mantz, in: Sydow, GDPR, 2nd ed. 3018, Art. 32 GDPR marginal 10. Likewise Piltz, in: Gola, DS-GVO, 2nd edition. 2018, Art. 32 DSGVO Rn. 3. 4Jandt, in: Kühling

circumstances mentioned in proportion and at the end of the Fine Policy, as applicable in the present case, further increase or decrease. 4.4 Conclusion The AP

defendant submitted its observations, which, in accordance with Article 54(1)(b), (3) and (4), (4) and (4), (5) and (5), (5) and (5), (5) and (5), (5)

defendant is defined in Articles 83.4.a) and 83.4.b) respectively. 83.5.a) of the RGPD, precepts that they establish: Article 83.4: "Violations of the following

tool. According to Art. 46 Para. 4 GDPR, the European Data Protection Board had to be involved. According to Art. 64 (2) GDPR, any supervisory authority can

establishment (Article 4(16) GDPR) in Norway and that its processing of the data subject’s personal data was cross-border processing (Article 4(23) GDPR). Therefore

data, the company considers that, in accordance with the provisions of recital 63 of the GDPR and Article 15(4) of the GDPR, it is not obliged to respond to

communications services in it meaning referred to in 50 US Code § 1881 (4)(b) and is thus subject to surveillance by US intelligence agencies in accordance with

data registered in the case file system. 4. Legal environment In this case, the complainant's request for certain information on searches in the National

nevertheless, in its opinion, result in a disproportionately high fine. 4.3 Level of the fine According to the AP, in this case the following factors, in particular

appeal). Article 6.4 of this car scheme reads: "6.4 GPS systems In many cases, the company car is equipped with a GPS system (blackbox). In order to have a

US, may thus not be in accordance with the GDPR, so that the defendant had to reject that tender, in accordance with the GDPR and in accordance with the

6 and 24 GDPR? Was the processing by Wind Tre in violation of Articles 5 and 6 GDPR? Was the information provided by Wind Tre to the users in breach of

14. The complaint procedure in accordance with Art. 77 GDPR is, in particular in the Austrian procedural design by § 24 GDPR, an adversarial multi-party

was a personal data breach pursuant to Article 4(12) GDPR. Moreover, it stated that Article 32(1) GDPR obliges controllers to take appropriate technical

enshrined in Article 25 GDPR. Additionally, the AEPD concluded that the controller had violated Article 5(1)(f) GDPR, noting that although the GDPR does not

of this Law except in the cases in which it authorizes it or violates the prohibition contained in the paragraph 4 of article 7 " In general, article 7

100,000 PLN for violating Article 5(1)(a) GDPR and Article 6(1) GDPR by publishing, on its website, numbers of land and mortgage registers without any

personal data on their website, in violation of Article 5 and Article 6 GDPR. The controller is a health clinic and has been in an ongoing legal dispute with

the criteria defined in article 83(5)(a) GDPR where a company can be fined up to €20000000, or in the case of an undertaking, up to 4 % of the total worldwide

stated in Section 4.5 of the Data Processor Agreement that, in accordance with the Data Protection Regulation, Schultz must assist municipalities in complying

(Article 21 GDPR) and the right to erasure (Article 17 GDPR) of data subjects. Therefore the controller was not found in breach of Article 25(2) GDPR. The DPA

mortgage register numbers on the controller’s website constituted a personal data breach within the meaning of Article 4(12) GDPR. Third, in considering the

is requested in the call referenced in the following point, at the time of said call, there was no contract in force since 2013, date in which the previous

context of Articles 40 and 41 GDPR, in particular from Article 40 Paragraph 4 in conjunction with Article 41 Paragraph 2 lit. c) GDPR, namely further that a monitoring

out in compliance with the processing principles set out in Art. 5 GDPR and on the basis of one of the grounds for permission set out in Art. 6 GDPR. Article

Article 83e(4) GDPR provides, inter alia, that infringements of the obligations imposed by Article 32 GDPR on the controller and processer will, in accordance

increase or decrease. 4.4 Conclusion The AP sets the total fine at €400,000. 8For the justification, see paragraphs 4.3.1 and 4.3.2. 24/25Date Unidentified

cf. Number 4 Article 3 of the Act and 2. tölul. Article 4 of the Regulation.This case relates to a security breach which resulted in ID numbers and figures

violated Article 32 GDPR for insufficient risk assessment and the lack of security measures in the app MyPostNord, which used phone numbers as the only means

record in the AEPD O00007128e2000007150) that are not listed in their systems registered calls from numbers *** PHONE. 8 or *** PHONE 4 to the numbers ***

reasons, under Article 58 GDPR, the HDPA reprimanded the controller for violating Article 5(1)(c) GDPR and Article 15 GDPR. In addition, the HDPA ordered

considered as processing of personal data under Article 4(2) GDPR, hence making the GDPR applicable. In third place, the DPA recalled the need for a legal basis

their ID number when purchasing tickets in violation of Article 5(1) GDPR, Article 5(2) GDPR and Article 6 GDPR. A data subject issued a complaint with

designed in a predefined way in order to signal and block in real time the attempts to load supply contracts obtained in an opaque manner or in any case

coming into force of the GDPR on 25. 5. 2018. Can a controller charge for access to historic account data under Article 15 GDPR? Is GDPR applicable to a case

winners prize games. In this regard, the Agency, in its statement, requested the company in question to in particular, it is evident in relation to the scope

and 13 GDPR? Is the information provided to data subjects throughout the subscription process in compliance with the provisions of Article 13 GDPR? Does

stored in a file system, without specific to refer to the exceptions in Art. 2 Para. 2 GDPR. In this regard, however, the provisions of the GDPR are opened

compatible with the GDPR? On the first point, the CJEU held that VINs constitute personal data within the meaning of Article 4(1) GDPR, in so far as the natural

from from receipt of the request. 9 3 4GDPR, Art. 4.7), 4.8), 24, 26, 28, 29; GDPR, recitals 74, 79 and 81. GDPR, art. 4, 2). 5EDPB, “Guidelines 07/2020 concerning

registration numbers, e-mail addresses, usernames and/or passwords, data on earnings and/or assets, series and numbers of ID cards, telephone numbers , information

registered (customers) pursuant to GDPR art. 34? It follows from GDPR art. 34 that Nemlig and Intervare as data controllers in case of security breach is obliged

authority to exercise its duties and powers, as set out in the GDPR properly. 4. Breaches of the GDPR 17EDPB Guideline on Examples regarding Data Breach Notification

points to the preamble to the GDPR in substantiation, in particular under numbers 122 and 128.3.2. Plaintiff also doubts whether in this case there is a legal

subjects. In relation to this, the DPA stated that the controller violated Article 5(1) GDPR, Article 5(2) GDPR, Article 6(1)(a) GDPR and Article 7 GDPR for

and therefore the media privilege according to Art. 85 GDPR in conjunction with Section 9 GDPR applies. 3. At the request of the data protection authority

by e-mail of 4 June 2018 that the complainant's data had been deleted Instead, by e-mail of 4 June 2018, he asked the complainant to fill in a form, providing

their valid consent. Leads Works Ltd has continued to send significant numbers of marketing texts to individuals throughout, and since, the course of the

83, par. 5 of the Regulation, in setting the statutory maximum in the sum of 20 million euros or, for companies, in 4% of the annual worldwide turnover

provided. Both in the GDPR itself (Art. 12 Para. 1 GDPR) and specifically in Section 32d Para. 1 AO, it is expressly stipulated that Art. 12-15 GDPR are regulations

records constitute 'data relating to health' in the sense of Article 4(15) GDPR. Pursuant to Article 9 GDPR, this special category of data can only be disclosed

the website in this way across. However, on 4 February 2020, the database was no longer available in this way. The Authority's NAIH / 2020/66/4. By order

12 GDPR and provide information under Article 13 GDPR and Article 14 GDPR when the data subjects declared themselves interested in its services. In light

Article 31 GDPR in conjunction with Article 58(1)(e) GDPR. The AEPD, therefore, agreed to impose a penalty of € 20000 under Article 83(5)(e) GDPR. The fact

Article 9 (1) GDPR, Article 6 (1) GDPR, Article 5 (1) in conjunction with Articles 12, 13 and/or Article 14 GDPR and/or Article 5 (1) (in particular lit

of security within the meaning of Article 4(12) GDPR. In such cases, Article 33(1) GDPR and Article 34(1) GDPR require controllers to, respectively, notify

purpose of the proceedings and in large numbers ('five files'). The complainant claimed that processing obligations in the sense of obligations to keep

compliance with the GDPR, since it had not checked if the third party from which it received its calling list was acting in a GDPR complaint manner. Therefore

6www.aepd.es28001 - Madridsedeagpd.gob.es Page 4 4/11THIRD: The result of the transfer process initiated in the previous Event does notallowed to understand

data under Article 15 GDPR? The Spanish DPA held that the airline company had not complied with the right to access in Article 15 GDPR when it refused to

its processing in line with the GDPR. Since it had come to the attention of the DPA that the controller had already adjusted in services in such a way that

social security numbers and names. In this connection, Hovedstadens Beredskab I/S has stated that the social security numbers are anonymised in the search results

that the notified fee is accepted. 4. The requirements of the regulations 4.1. Responsible for processing Article 4 (7) of the Privacy Regulation defines

implementing a double opt-in process for user registrations, the respondent violated Article 5 GDPR, Article 6 GDPR, and Article 32 GDPR, and § 1 para 1 DSG

controller had violated Article 5(1)(f) GDPR, Article 17(1) GDPR, Article 25(1) GDPR, Article 32(1) GDPR and Article 32(2) GDPR. As a result, the DPA issued a reprimand

the Austrian Armed Forces in order to asses the member in the context of an "extended reliability check" which is foreseen in national law. The Respondent

the processing of personal data is not covered by the GDPR, according to Article 2(2)(c) of the GDPR. However, the DPA concluded that Orienteringsret.dk

13, 14 GDPR), also the defendant clearly and in ease language pointed to the default settings, so no breach of Article 25 GDPR or Article 32 GDPR either

under Art. 34 GDPR or the supervisory authority under Art. 33 GDPR, since the requirements of the legal definition in Art. 4 No. 12 GDPR were not met.

which consists in saving the telephone numbers of individuals in the company's telephone number database. All persons who agree to participate in a survey by

referred to in paragraphs 4, 9 and 6 is in each individual case effective, proportionate and dissuasive. "Administrative fines shall be imposed in addition

infringement. Thus, in the area of application of the GDPR - as applied in the present case - the absorption principle of Art. 83 (3) GDPR applies. 4. In relation

(Art. 6 Para. 1 lit. f GDPR). In this context, Art. 6 Para. 1 lit. c GDPR in conjunction with the PMG and Art. 6 Para. 1 lit. f GDPR relevant: The Respondent

Article 33 GDPR, it is the controller's duty to report breaches, while processors may assist as outlined in Article 28(3)(f) GDPR. In fact, the GDPR does not

of the main establishment of the respondent (Art. 4(16)(a) GDPR) in Austria, whereby the complaint in question was lodged directly with the Austrian Data

camera system, in a multi-locked location. After processing, the data was stored in tabular (.csv) format in The paper sheets are stored in a multi-locked

information in the manner and in the form specified in the request (paragraph 1). If public information cannot be made available in the manner or in the form

28(9) GDPR requires the agreement to be in writing, including in electronic form. Second, the DPA clarified the roles of the entities involved in processing

processing according to Article 4(2) GDPR and thus requires a legal basis according to Article 6(1) GDPR and comply with Article 5 GDPR. The controller did not

the calling numbers as its own numbers. 3) Similarly, the controller presented several arguments in relation to telephone directories. In general, it stated

available data as referred to in Article 4, opening words and under 2 of the GDPR, and thus as processing within the meaning of the GDPR. Because submission is

foundation in its capacity of controller. In October 2019 the foundation notified the AEPD for the data breach. Which provisions of the GDPR did the AEPD

under Article 82(1) GDPR were awarded for the web-scraping of publicly accessible personal data as the mere infringement of the GDPR is not sufficient to

including health data, recorded in copies Article 6 (1) of the GDPR and, in the case of health data, Article 9 of the GDPR. Article 1 (1); (3) did not provide

council had violated Article 13 GDPR and Article 25(1) GDPR. However, since the deficiencies regarding Article 13 GDPR were corrected before the end of

meaning of Article 4.9. of the GDPR, but this quality does not exclude that in turn, it has intervened in the capacity of treatment. 4.1. As regards the

2016/679, as defined in the first paragraph. Article 4 of the Act, cf. Points 2 and 4 Article 3 of the Act and points 1 and 2. Article 4 of the Regulation

communications services in it meaning referred to in 50 US Code § 1881 (4)(b) and is thus subject to surveillance by US intelligence agencies in accordance with

the scope of Art. 82 GDPR, since this is not a processing of personal data i. s.d. Art. 4 No. 2 GDPR. According to Art. 4 No. 2 GDPR, processing is any process

infringement; h) the way in which the supervisory authority learned of the infringement, in in particular if the person in charge or the person in charge notified

CFR Art8 para 11 CFR Art11 para 1 ECHR Art10 para 1 GDPR Art4 no 2 GDPR Art4 no 7 GDPR Art85 para 1 GDPR Art85 para 2 Text GZ: DSB-D123.768/0004-DSB/2019

breach in connection with the company testing a new scanning tool. The tool was set to search for social security numbers and credit card numbers. The scan

makes a distinction between searches in the case file system by ID numbers and case numbers, as searches by case numbers do not have to be related to the person

organizations, version 4, Forum for Standardization, p. 29. based on all the criteria mentioned in the Guide version 4, results in a confidence level "high"

(Karg, in: Simitis/Hornung/Spiecker, Datenschutzrecht, 2019, Art. 4 No. 1 GDPR marginal number 62; Article 29 Data Protection Group, Opinion 4/2007 on

that the controller was in breach of Article 33(1) GDPR, Article 33(3) GDPR, Articles 34(1) and 34(2) GDPR, and Article 5(2) GDPR, Firstly, the Polish DPA

data in accordance with the principles set out in Art. 5 of Regulation 2016/679, in this case in accordance with Art. 5 sec. 1 lit. f). & # 13; In conclusion

have in their luckily, without having to change any numbers, was able to access the information in the documents only by clicking on the URL. That in some

processing in line with the GDPR. This is the Danish DPA's third decision in the case relating to Helsingor municipality's processing of personal data in primary

infringing Article 6(1) GDPR, in relation with the lawfulness principle established by Article 5(1)(a) GDPR. Article 5(1)(d) GDPR establishes that personal

Articles 83 (4) and 83 (5). In case of an infringement of these shall the supervisory authority consider imposing administrative penalties in addition to

decision date 06/30/2023 standard B-VG Art133 Para.4 DSG §1 DSG §24 GDPR Art4 GDPR Art44 GDPR Art5 GDPR Art6 VwGVG §28 paragraph 2 B-VG Art. 133 today B-VG

recommendations in the document. The dispute in these summary proceedings 4.4. The parties have had a healthcare agreement with each other for many years. In a letter

defendant's violations of the GDPR consist in the fact that the defendant, as the person responsible (Art. 4 No. 7 GDPR), in 2019 collected personal data

identifiers are used. In Iceland, there is no access to Danish social security numbers (CPR numbers) or the code used to analyze samples in Denmark in Computerome

the storage limitation in the telecommunication act is lex specialis to the general provision on storage in Article 5 (1)(e) GDPR. On June 2, 2020, the

data set out in the GDPR, notably those of Article 5 GDPR. As for the second question, the CJEU assessed whether the provisions of the GDPR should be interpreted

Article 4 of the GDPR. 11.2 The claimant has the obligation laid down in Article 13.4 of the Tw to provide customer data under the conditions set out in that

thus acting as a processor in the sense of Article 4(8) GDPR, while X was acting as a controller in the sense of Article 4(7) GDPR. The Finnish DPA had already

Article 28(3) GDPR for not having a data processing agreement in place; Violating Article 32(2) GDPR, cf. Article 5(1)(f) GDPR and Article 5(2) GDPR for not

function. In this way, telephone numbers could be assigned to identified users. This resulted in a data breach concerning 533 million people in 106 different

they are in agreement with the processing of the personal data concerning you". According to Art. 7 Para. 4 GDPR and taking into account Art. 4 Z 11 and

function. In this way, telephone numbers could be assigned to identified users. This resulted in a data breach concerning 533 million people in 106 different

of the person in question the processing of personal data. In addition, the company has stated in summary following. All information in Indecap's system

breached Article 32 GDPR by not adequately protecting the personal data of individuals, including names, addresses and ID numbers, in a criminal complaint

company. In total, following its investigations the CNIL found five breaches of the GDPR: -         Violation of the right to object, Article 21(2) GDPR: no

did not acknowledge that with the introduction of Title 8.4 in the Awb on the basis of Article 8:4, paragraph 1, opening words and under f of the Awb, the

(Articles 15 and 17 GDPR). The DPA held that the controller breached Articles 12(3) GDPR, Article 15(1) GDPR and Article 17(1) GDPR by not responding to

security numbers and health information. The Danish Data Protection Agency finds that there has been a breach of personal data security, cf. Article 4, no.

Emailmovers Limited (EML) was a data controller by virtue of the definition in Article 4(7) GDPR. First, the ICO highlighted that EML's "Legal and Commercial Terms

the controller within the meaning of Article 4(7) of the GDPR. 4.2. Pursuant to Article 6(1)(f) of the GDPR, the processing of personal data is only lawful

phone numbers in User A’s address book, which could in principle include the phone numbers of non-users. In such circumstances, [WhatsApp] will, in a very

evidence that are expressed in them. THIRD.- In the two joined lawsuits that are being processed in this proceeding, it is requested in first place that the business

pursuant to Art. 4(4) of the GDPR - so that it cannot be assumed that the standard for national norms contained in Art. 9(2)(i) of the GDPR would be violated

submitted to it in accordance with its previous operating method. Order of the Data Protection Commissioner in cases 834/532/18 and 8212/161/19 4. In cases 834/532/18

and 9; (…)” In this regard, the LOPDGDD, in its article 71 "Infringements" establishes that “The acts and behaviors referred to in sections 4, 5 and 6 of

reasonable to reprimand the data controller in accordance with the GDPR and terminate the proceeding. 4.3. In regard to complaint , the complainant wished

course for all employees regarding. GDPR, just as the correct use of shipping methods is continuously emphasized in relevant contexts. Furthermore, from

A48265169, for the alleged violation of Article 32 of the GDPR typified in Article 83.4 of the GDPR. C/ Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 – Madrid sedeagpd.gob

beyond numbers 1 to 3) data of the European health insurance card that goes beyond numbers one to 3 e) other government identifiers. (3) The data in accordance

have applied Article 35 GDPR. In light of the above, the Italian DPA used its corrective powers under Article 58(2)(c) and 83 GDPR and fined the controller

referred to in paragraphs 4, 5 and 6 is in each individual case effective, proportionate and dissuasive. 2. Administrative fines shall be imposed in addition

since 2013 have been created in T. Hansen Gruppen A / S 'customer system with three different customer numbers. Telephone numbers usually constitute the customer

function. In this way, telephone numbers could be assigned to identified users. This resulted in a data breach concerning 533 million people in 106 different

violated Article 28(2) GDPR and Article 28(4) GDPR as a processor on behalf of the hospitals and Article 28(1) GDPR and Article 28(3) GDPR as controller delegating

education in Articles 13 and 14. of the Regulation, cf. Article 17 of the Act. Issues in this connection are discussed in Chapter 5 below. 4.Employment

adopted to exclude the inclusion of numbers in the list. contactable (for example, numbers in the opposition register, numbers that cannot be contacted due to

violated Article 33(1) GDPR. Moreover, it violated Article 34(1) GDPR since it did not provide the data subjects with the information listed in Article 33(3)(b)

act, which in this case occurred in part before 25 May 2018, the old law, i.e. the Wbp, applies. 4. The Division is of the opinion that in this transitional

Regulation, in the terms set out in the motivation, ORDER in Roma Capitale, in the person of the pro-tempore legal representative, with registered office in Piazza

aforementioned art. 83, par. 5, in setting the maximum legal limit in the sum of 20 million euros or, for companies, in 4% of the annual worldwide turnover

meaning of Art. 4 Z. 7 Previous search term GDPR Next search term but as a processor within the meaning of Art. 4 Z. 8 Previous search term GDPR Next search

met.In light of what is indicated in the aforementioned article, only data may be processedwhen they have the consent of the persons in question, in the

authority to verify compliance with GDPR by the controller (the court) involved in the incident. Referencing Article 4(12) GDPR, the DPA found that the event

Article 19 GDPR. The DPA held that the controllers could have breached Article 21(2) GDPR, Article 21(3) GDPR and Article 17(1)(c) GDPR in combination

personal data is processed in Mediconnect in the form of information about name, address, e-mail address, telephone numbers, citizenship, birthday, gender

permissions standardized in Article 6 Para. 1 GDPR. There was also no permissible further processing in accordance with Art. 6 Para. 4 GDPR. In your role as controller

infringement; h) the way in which the supervisory authority became aware of the infringement, in particular if the person in charge or the person in charge notified

according to Art 15 Paragraph 1 GDPR, such as the origin of the data. In accordance with Art 15 (4) GDPR and Recital 63 GDPR, the information must be restricted

designated by Union or Member State law (Article 4(7) of the GDPR). According to Art. 4 point 12 of the GDPR, "personal data breach" means a breach of security

information requested with the application for numbers 4 and 5 to be specified in more detail Increases in premiums and payment of the amount yet to be quantified

processing according to Article 4(2) GDPR In its decision, the court considered only the list of examples laid down in Article 4(2) GDPR, although the list is not

presence of numbers already customers; verification of the presence of numbers in the company's black list; cross-reference of the numbers made available

of the Regulation is in that case processed in accordance with section 7 (1) of the Data Protection Act. 4. This provision is in the nature of a collection

Personal Data Act of year 2000 in Norway, and not the GDPR. The DPA does, however, refer to corresponding Articles in the GDPR: Articles 5(1)(b) and (c), as

a subscriber in respect of the called line is one listed in the register kept under regulation 26." 6. Regulation 21 paragraphs (2), (3)(4) and (5) provide

aid in the identification work in the future. The Central Criminal Police had 4 personal trial licenses in use, which were valid for one month. In connection

Article 12 GDPR? - Did the controller identify the actors playing a role in the processing, with respect to Articles 4(7), (8) and Articles 26, 28 GDPR (processor

Authority in 2021. received at the request on 4 June 2006, registered in […] (registered office: […]; hereinafter referred to as the “Requested”) in the data

authorization in item 4. Article 42 Act no. 90/2018, it is proposed for Icelandair to move the processing of personal information in the CrewApp applet, in connection

situation (instinct in Knyrim, DatKomm Art 35 GDPR, margin no.116). C.2. In the matter 1. The person in charge states that there is a high risk in relation to

aforementioned art. 83, par. 5, in setting the statutory maximum in the sum of 20 million euros or, for companies, in 4% of the annual worldwide turnover

32(1) and (4) GDPR.” 32. Article 32 of the GDPR relates to the security of processing of personal data. More specifically, Article 32(1) of the GDPR states

2016/679, as defined in the first paragraph. Article 4 of the Act, cf. Points 2 and 4 Article 3 of the Act and points 1 and 2. Article 4 of the Regulation

should be noted, in First, that the transfer of the claim contained in article 65.4 of the LOPDGDD is configured as an optional procedure in the opinion of

General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which came into force in May of the year, both in-house and at the subsidiaries. In a letter dated January 31, 2018

breach in the sense of Article 4, headings under 12, of the GDPR. What should be clear is that a breach is some type of security incident Article 4, headings

claimant on behalf of someone else in another objection procedure will not be included in the documents provided. 4. The court will make the following

for failing to process the members´ personal data in accordance with Article 32(1) GDPR. The DPA found in particular that the company had not implemented

data under Article 15(1) GDPR is limited by the law. Limitations result from Article 13(4) GDPR and Article 23(1)(e) GDPR in conjunction with §§ 32a ff

5(1)(a) GDPR, Article 6(1)(a) GDPR, Article 7 GDPR, and without informing the data subjects of all the essential information required by Article 13 GDPR and

Data Inspectorate DI-2019-7024 1 4 (31) The board has stated that when logging in takes place in the Student Documentation in The school platform is exposed

of these calls were made to users registered with the TPS, a register of numbers allocated to subscribers who have notified the ICO that they do not wish

provided by the BF in its statement of September 9, 2020 and were not questioned in terms of content by the MB. 4. From this it follows legally: 4.1. The relevant

criteria into account included in article 6.4 GDPR and recital 50 GDPR, it must be determined whether the further processing, in this case the sending of the

personal data has not taken place in accordance with the rules in Article 32 (1) of the Data Protection Regulation. 1. 5.4. Data Processor Agreements Based

the fingerprint scanners when logging in and out of employees in the company's salary system Case no. 2020010343 4.9.2020 The Data Protection Authority

interest of The applicant in the sense of the legal basis of Article 6 (1) (f) GDPR.47The applicant cannot refer to Article 13 (4) GDPR in this regard. According

000 for violations of Articles 5(1)(f), 32(1) and 33(1) GDPR by failing to notify a data breach in due time, and lacking appropriate technical and organisational

3(1) GDPR. Marriott has confirmed that Marriott Hotels Limited i Marriott’s main establishment within the EU, as defined i Article 4(16) GDPR. 1.4. The

the GDPR. According to the defendant, this partner is thus not processor within the meaning of Article 4 (8) GDPR. Consequently, Article 28 (3) GDPR does

Valoris did not fulfill its obligations laid down in Article 29, Article 32(1)(b), and Article 32(4) GDPR. Even if the employee of Valoris was not allowed

15 March 2023 in the case of the foundation DATA PRIVACY FOUNDATION, Based in Amsterdam, plaintiff, lawyer mr. J.H. Lemstra in Amsterdam, in return for 1

the court answered in the case was whether the Dutch DPA had proven that MAC addresses constitute personal data under Article 4(1) GDPR. The court held that

violated Article 5(1)(a) GDPR, Article 5(1)(c) GDPR and Article 25(2) GDPR. As a result, the DPA issued a reprimand to the controller in accordance with Article

identification number in connection with paid Document Requests The processing of personal identification numbers is regulated in section 29 of the Data

specific patient by posting in SP on CPR. The board has stated that this is not a competent authority in relation to the GDPR. 2.3. Region Zealand's comments

are to date in District N., broken down by the individual municipalities in the district. 3 That decision is challenged by the defendant in his appeal.

Articles 32(1)(b) and 32(1)(d) GDPR, as well as a breach of Article 4(5) of Law 506/2004. In regards to Article 32 GDPR, the DPA found that the controller

same in section 67 of G.C. & amp; Others in CNIL: 'In addition, in the case where the processing concerns the specific categories of information in Article

«certain» change in practice in relation to what the Privacy Board had expressed in PVN-2010-11, see Prop.47 L (2011-2012) section 4.6. In reality, however

steps to prevent these contraventions. In reaching this view, ICO has had regard in particular to: the fact that in many instances Cathay Pacific was failing

section 61 (1), the Authority in sections (2) and (4) of section 2 in connection with specific data management operations in the general data protection

geographic milieus calculated in this case is in any case a profiling within the meaning of Art. 4 No. 4 GDPR. Since Art. 15 (1) (h) GDPR does not limit the specific

“configure the browser on their terminal equipment.” Were URLs 1-4 in breach of the GDPR? The AEPD held that Canary Click Consulting breached European and

obligation in Article 19 GDPR, even though the controller bears the burden of proof under Article 5(2) GDPR in conjunction with Article 24(1) GDPR. Share your

subject considers that, in connection with personal data relating to him or her, there is an infringement of Part 3 or 4 of this Act. […] (4) If the Commissioner

Article 6(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7 GDPR, which cannot be superseded by relying on Article 6(1)(b) GDPR? Is Article 5(1)(c) GDPR (data minimisation)

turnover of […] euros in 2019 and […] euros in 2020, for a net result amounting to […] euros in 2019 and [ …] euros in 2020. 106. In view of these elements

meaning of article 4.7 of the GDPR; - A breach of articles 13.1. a), 13.1 c) and 13.2 of the GDPR in respect of the first defendant in that the platform's

been no violation of Article 32(4) GDPR, and in the alternative, that: in accordance with the provisions of Article 83(2) GDPR, the BGN 1500 fine should be

unlawful clauses in its general terms and conditions in violation of Article 6(1)(b) GDPR and Article 6(1)(f) GDPR. The plaintiff in this case is a consumer

58(2)(d) GDPR. The company must take all necessary measures for internal compliance and accountability according to Article 5(1) GDPR, Article 5(2) GDPR and

According to Article 4(4) of the GDPR, profiling is defined as "any form of automated processing of personal data which consists in using such personal

regarding Article 6(1) GDPR and consent requirements regulated previously to GDPR. The fact that the infringements related to Article 25 GDPR did not include

aggravating factors that concur in this case, is made in the basis of law 4. 3. In relation to the facts described in the proven facts section, relating

signatures personal data within the meaning of Article 4(1) GDPR? Is there a legal basis under Article 6 GDPR that would justify the disclosure of the signatures

applicability of the GDPR set out in Article 3(2)(a) GDPR were met since the controller offered its services to data subjects in the EU. The DPA claimed

carried out in the public interest or in the exercise of official authority vested in the controller; c) for reasons of public interest in the field of

and guarantee of digital rights (LOPDGDD), in force since December 7, 2018. 4, The RGPD defines in its article 4.1 personal data as "all information about

names, social security numbers, cell phone numbers, addresses and health data. 498 599 patients were registered in the system in April 2021. The region

on 24 September 2021 to be in violation of the GDPR since there was no “decline” option, which infringes Article 7(3) GDPR. Accordingly, the DPA held that

typified in Article 83.4 of the GDPR. FOURTH: The person in charge has not requested the practice of tests or the sending of the documentation in the file

security of the data, in violation of Article 32(1) and (2) GDPR and warned the controller for a violation of Article 25(1) GDPR. The DPA fined the controller

already sent in the complaint filed on January 2, 2019. Below the links indicated in the publications reviewed with the numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9,

Para. 4 GDPR and this also results without doubt from Art. 78 Para. 2 GDPR. The filing of a complaint in accordance with Article 77, Paragraph 1, GDPR in

consistency contained in Chapter VII GDPR. The supervisory authorities concerned have been the data protection authorities in in Germany, Postal address:

consent are set out in Art. 4 No. 11, Art. 7 and - additionally in relation to the consent of minors - Art. 8 DS-GVO. According to Art. 4 No. 11 DS-GVO a consent

increasing trend in 7-day incidences, which became visible in all age groups in the last week. This year's case numbers are significantly higher than in the same

5(1)(f) GDPR, Article 5(1)(a) GDPR, Article 5(2) GDPR, Article 12 GDPR, Article 13 GDPR, Article 14 GDPR, Article 24(1) GDPR, and Article 25 GDPR, as a result

subscriber's line to be used in contravention of paragraph (l)." 6. Regulation 21A paragraphs (4), and (5) materially state that: "( 4) In this regulation "claims

concluded between the person in charge and the person in charge, as stipulated in the Article 28, paragraph 3, of the GDPR. In this regard, Guidelines 07/2020

classified in article 83.4.a) of the aforementioned RGPD in the following terms: "4. Infringements of the following provisions shall be punished, in accordance

infringement; h) the way in which the supervisory authority learned of the infringement, in in particular if the person in charge or the person in charge notified

Article 6(1)(f) GDPR. The DPA then assessed whether the Party had acted in accordance with the information obligations in Article 14 GDPR. First, the DPA

the breach, pursuant to the obligation expressed in Article 34 GDPR, in conjunction with Article 12 GDPR. Based on this assessment, the DPA issued an administrative

infringement fee In determining the fee, the points in section 5.4 above shall be given weight, cf. Article 83 no. 2. The fee shall in each individual case

personal data was carried out in accordance with the GDPR and the French law n°78-17 of 6 January 1978 implementing the GDPR (hereinafter: the Information

contract or other legal act referred to in paragraphs 3 and 4 shall be in writing, inter alia in electronic form". 227. In accordance with Article 24 (1) of

and Article 4(11) GDPR. Information relating to the purposes of processing must also be easily accessible pursuant to Article 12(1) GDPR, in the broader

case. In conclusion, the Family Court has stated that, in general, GDPR ambassadors in the individual departments regularly prepare and carry out awareness

principles of the GDPR likely to be subject, under Article 83 of the GDPR, to an administrative fine of up to 20,000,000 euros or up to 4% of annual turnover

Consent in PECR is now defined, from 29 March 2019, by reference to the concept of consent in Regulation 2016/679 (“the GDPR”): Regulation 8(2) of the Data

Article 5, paragraph 1, e) of the GDPR 19. According to Article 5, paragraph 1, e) of the GDPR, personal data must be kept in a form allowing the identification

stated in its opinion that, in order to ensure conformity with the data subject’s rights of information under Article 13 GDPR and Article 14 GDPR, the hospital

right to privacy (Article 4(1) of the Press Law). The journalist is entitled to obtain information in the scope referred to in art. 4 of the Press Law, and

false sick leave certificates. 4.4.1. In considering the question of grading sick leave, the employer should always bear in mind that, although employees

12 and 13 of the GDPR constitute breaches of key principles of the GDPR likely to be subject to, under Article 83 of the GDPR. GDPR, an administrative

constitute personal data. 3.4 The processing constitutes profiling 3.4.1 Applicable regulations Profiling is defined in Article 4.4 of the Data Protection Regulation

2018, cannot be required in a claim for interim injuction. In any event, there is no need for legal remedy in this regard in view of the appeals brought

personal data in violation of Articles 12 and 13 GDPR? Did Nestor fail to respect the exercises of the right of access in violation of Article 15 GDPR? Did Nestor

as referred to in Article 15 paragraph 1 under a, b, c, d, g, h AVG and in Art. 26 para. 2 GDPR. 5.14. In that regard, T-Mobile will in any case have to

interests of the complainant. In view of this, the DPA considered that the processing in question was not in accordance with the GDPR. Furthermore, the DPA held

than in 2020, and the entire year 2021 in terms of numbers and amounts was significantly more dangerous than the previous one: a 17% increase in the number

set out in Section 122(5) of the DPA 2018; •“Consent” in PECR as set out in Article 4(11) the General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679 (the “GDPR”) read

from § 4 para. 3 by means of a joint ordinance. 72 The authorization basis in § 32 sentence 1 in conjunction with § Section 28(1) IfSG and Section 4(5) CoronaVO

other activities), and in alphabetical order, including the one claimed in the listed as it appears in the list of the claimed. 4) The page www.cursosefficients

provided. Both in the GDPR itself (Art. 12 Para. 1 GDPR) and specifically in Section 32d Para. 1 AO, it is expressly stipulated that Art. 12-15 GDPR are regulations

points in the Matura exam and language certificate. In addition, the University, in response to the initiation of the procedure, indicated that in all currently

Article 21(2) GDPR and Article 13(2) of the e-Privacy Directive. Therefore, the Persónuvernd concluded that the company did not comply with the GDPR and the

misconstrued on the grounds stated in paragraph 4 below, in particular in marginal numbers 4.16, 4.22, 4.24, 4.29, 4.30, 4.31, 4.35 and 4.36. I explain the ground

Protection Agency supervised in the summer of 2021 in accordance with the rules on data protection. The audit focused on access rights in Høje-Taastrup Municipality's

Article 15(1) GDPR with its reply from December 2019. The Court first held that the BayLfSt was a controller within the meaning of Article 4(7) GDPR. Next, the

territory due to a lack in authority pursuant to Article 55(2) GDPR and the diplomatic immunity enshrined in international law. In the case at hand, a data

In an Article 60 GDPR decision, the Swedish DPA reprimanded a company for, among others, a violation of Article 6 GDPR. Since the data subject had provided

data subject, in particular of professional secrecy, is required. 4. In the matter The Respondent relies on § 19 4. 4. COVID-19-SchuMaV in conjunction with

Article 4(7) GDPR. must be dismissed as to all of the subject matters raised because they are not responsible within the meaning of Article 4(7) GDPR. On point

and 26) and, if of the case, of responsible (art. 4, n. 8 and 28). 4. The Authority's assessments 4.1. Evaluations regarding the processing of personal

found that RODA had breached Article 5(1) GDPR (principle of data minimisation), as well as Article 12(3) and 15 GDPR (right of access by the data subject -

i), art. 83 sec. 1-2 and art. 83 sec. 4 lit. a) in connection with Art. 33 paragraph 1 and art. 34 sec. 1, 2 and 4 of Regulation 2016/679 of the European

one, GDPR. 3.2.4. The GDPR defines the term processing in Art. 4 Z 2 GDPR by listing a number of possible usage processes. This includes collecting, recording

Paragraph 1, GDPR (legality). The person responsible is instructed to limit the image processing of cameras 1, 2, 3 and 4 within a period of two weeks in such

Article 21 GDPR, in violation of Article 13(2)(b) GDPR. As to automated decision-making, including profiling under Articles 22(1) and (4) GDPR, the IMY noted

Article 9(2)(b) GDPR. The LArbG Berlin-Brandenburg also confirmed that the processing was not necessary in light of Article 9(2)(b) GDPR, and emphasised

rights in the administration of social welfare, in accordance with Article 32 GDPR. First, the DPA asked the controller for a list of systems in which data

28001 – Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es 4/29 In no case are special categories of data defined in article 9.1 processed. of the GDPR, nor are data of particularly

Article 82(1) GDPR in connection to a violation of Article 15 GDPR can only be sought in the case of unlawful data processing, and not in the case of delayed

Eve platform in the monitoring procedures envisaged in SEOL. In particular, SEOL monitors the data uploaded to N.EVE and generates alerts in the event of

sedeagpd.gob.es Page 4 4/141 duplicate, with a stamped envelope, the contractual documentation in compliance with the provided in the consumer and user

”(provides copy of document 4) and that is now being separated in various treatment activities (provides a copy of document 3). In document 4, previous situation

the GDPR, Article 24(1) of the GDPR and Article 25(1) paragraph 2 of the GDPR; and 2. a breach of Article 12 paragraph 1 and paragraph 4 of the GDPR, Article

Article 32(1) GDPR. The DPA reprimanded the controller pursuant of Article 58(2)(b) GDPR and held that this was a minor infringement (recital 148 GDPR). It considered

of five people in the police system. The data he accessed included names, surnames, addresses, car registration numbers and mentions in reports. He however

Article 6(4)(a) of the GDPR, lawfully processed the personal data of the customers in the test database in accordance with Article 5(1)(b) of the GDPR and in

purpose in obtaining that personal data, namely for the execution of the agreement. It is according to article 6 paragraph 4 GDPR is allowed in certain

Article 4(7) GDPR. must be dismissed as to all of the subject matters raised because they are not responsible within the meaning of Article 4(7) GDPR. On point

made in the TakeCare medical record system, in accordance with Chapter 4, Section 2 § and Chapter 6. 7 § Patient Data Act (2008:355) and Chapter 4 § 2 The

the safety measures taken in Heilsuvera in general. In light of, among other things, the sensitive nature of the information in question and the contradictory

expressly regulated in Art. 83 GDPR, this is not the case with Art. 82 GDPR. In addition, it should be taken into account that in the present case around

access pursuant to Article 15 GDPR, in particular to provide a copy of the personal data pursuant to Article 15(3) GDPR, as well as their right to receive

alleged infringement had occurred in April 2018, before the GDPR came into effect. Therefore, GDPR should not had applied. The Spanish National High Court (AN)

concerns a matter to which the GDPR applies, the matters listed in Article 83(1) and (2) of the GDPR." 21. The failures identified in section 149(2) DPA 2018

aforementioned art. 83, par. 5, in setting the maximum legal limit in the sum of 20 million euros or, for companies, in 4% of the annual worldwide turnover

processing register in accordance with §§ 17 ff in conjunction with §§ 8 Para. 1 Z 4 (mainly authorized interests), 8 Para. 3 Z 4 (performance of contract)

personal data in line with Article 34(1) GDPR. They expressed serious criticism of the way the CTA had dealt with the personal data breach, in particular

users in all schools in the city. The DPA decided that the controller had violated Articles 5(1)(a), 5(1)(c), 5(1)(f) GDPR, and Article 25(2) GDPR when

rights concerned in order to If not, please explain the reasons for not taking action. 4) All submissions made for the public hearing in public will be negotiated

interest 4.       The Board disputes the interest of [appellant] in the appeal, because a decision has been taken on his request for inspection. 4.1. [Appellant]

c) of the GDPR, typified in article 83.5 of the GDPR, and for the alleged infringement of article 13, typified in article 83.5.b) of the GDPR. SIXTH: The

parties gain access. 4.4. In the case of a claim for a declaration of judgment, the starting point is that there must be an interest in this. For that interest

University in Sweden acquired copies of all preliminary investigation reports in Sweden for 2014 on cases of rape of male victims from the police. In July 2016

Popcorn Time. 2.4.4. The peers that exchange a particular file participate in a “BitTorrent swarm”. Via the BitTorrent client, a peer in the swarm can see

reputation. 30The requests for access to the business documents (numbers 2 and 4) are necessary in view of the parallel legal disputes between the parties: 31In

524) Article 4:34 In addition to the obligation to provide information as laid down in Article 4:20, the provider has an obligation, in respect of credit

the GDPR in his request for access, while this would have been obvious, given his intention and knowledge of the GDPR. Failure to mention the GDPR in his

12(3) GDPR and Article 12(4) GDPR. Additionally, the DPA held that the controller, whether or not it considered the request under Article 15 GDPR, should

5(1)(a) GDPR was fulfilled to the extent that the controller is not obliged to provide information to the data subject under Article 13(4) GDPR if the latter

protocol in place, the company had modified the power supply contract without the data subject’s consent, in violation of Article 6 GDPR. In light of the

section 13(6) of the German Telemedia Act (TMG) or Article 4(7) GDPR and Artcicle 25(1) GDPR? The Higher Regional Court Munich dismissed the appeal and

[184]). (recital 46)2. § Article 14.2 and Article 15.5 sentence 4 in conjunction with In this respect, § 14.2 of the Telemedia Act does not constitute a

member. LB has stated in the case that the error originated in the implementation of the insurance company's portal solution in 2019. LB states that the

and social security numbers of approx. 1,525 citizens in Denmark. On 15 June 2021, DAHL Advokatpartnerselskab issued a statement in the case on behalf of

pursuant to Article 17(1)(d) GDPR because the processing was unlawful under Article 6 GDPR and the exception of Article 17(3)(a) GDPR did not apply. The DSB

as defined in Article 4(15) GDPR. For the reasons stated above, the DPA found the controller in violation of Article 5 GDPR, Article 9 GDPR and Article

two terminated employees in the school area in Gladsaxe Municipality, who were established in SBSYS before resigning in the 4th quarter of 2021. It further

cross-border as defined in Article 4, Section 23 of the General Data Protection Regulation. Such matters must be handled in the manner stipulated in Article 56 and

constituting a breach of Article 12(2) GDPR and Article 12(3) GDPR, as well as Article 15 GDPR, Article 17 GDPR and Article 21(2) GDPR. Thus, the calls carried out

that the claimant in his writing when referring to “the black list ”in which you have entered the telephone numbers of Telefónica, in the moment when one

actually conducting audits in line with the routines that did exist. The DPA held that the accountability principle in Article 5 GDPR entails an obligation

processing of personal data establishes theGDPR; in particular in contracting through a representative in which you mustbe in a position to prove both the reality

to a discrepancy in the product descriptions for 164 item numbers (medicines). This erroneous information was displayed in FMK so that in the period between

specified in Section 24 (4) DSG. The complainant's complaint of April 5, 2023 was made within the deadline set in paragraph 24, paragraph 4, DSG. D.2.

"warnings" in order to convince the court. In addition, the lack of prosecution of the alleged claims in court must be taken into account. In contrast to

default (Art. 25 GDPR), integrity and confidentiality (Art. 5.1.f GDPR), as well as security ofprocessing(Art. 32GDPR)......101 B.4.4. - Additional alleged

data had been included in the database FSV. The data subject argued that his inclusion in the database did not comply with the GDPR. The Court stated, with

of the measure. 4.4 The concept of personal data The term personal data is defined in the Personal Data Protection Regulation Article 4 No. 1 as "any information

(Article 6(1)(f) GDPR). Article 6(1)(b) GDPR In its original draft decision, the DPC held that Meta could use Article 6(1)(b) GDPR GDPR as a legal ground

administrative fines in accordance with this article for the infractions of this Regulation indicated in the Sections 4, 9 and 6 are in each individual case

the Regulation. This provision, in setting the statutory maximum in the sum of 20 million euros or, for companies, in 4% of the annual worldwide turnover

information is collected only in agreement with the parents of the pupils (in certain cases, except when the pupil is in danger in the family and needs to be

applies. VoetbalTV is the controller as referred to in Article 4, preamble and under 7, of the GDPR for this processing of personal data. 2.       The AP

Article 9(2) GDPR for sending the medical assessment, which contained health data under Article 14 GDPR#15Article 4(15) GDPR, to the municipality. In particular

Law, both in the regulations in force in distance contracting and in the application of the principle of proactive responsibility of the GDPR. Thus, the

Interpreted in this way, the regulation made in Section 4 (2) sentences 1 and 2 of the subcontractor contract does not raise any concerns in terms of data

meet the requirements for consent Art. 4 Z 11 GDPR and Art. 7 Para. 2 GDPR. 4.) Against this background and in view of the fact that according to stRsp

processed automatically, in any case it is collected, stored and adapted (see the definition in Art. 4 No. 2 GDPR). A file only in paper form represents a

of Article 5(1)(f) GDPR, Article 6 GDPR and Article 32(2) GDPR. The first complainant is a company that is engaged, inter alia, in the purchase and sale

defendants had infringed Article 15 GDPR. Regarding the right to information, the Icelandic DPA stressed that under Article 12(4) GDPR, the municipality should have

Article 82(1) of the GDPR states that full compensation for actual non-material damage resulting from breaches of the GDPR must take place in a manner that does

the defendant violated its obligation under Art. 32 GDPR and Art. 5 GDPR. According to Art. 32 GDPR, the person responsible and the processor have appropriate

certainty laid down in § 253.2 no. 2 ZPO. A specific application is required. It must state - in a manner that is understandable in itself - the nature

violation of Article 12 GDPR ? Are the following practices an infringement on data subjects' information right as described in Article 12 GDPR ? Spreading the

provisions as stated in Article 95, § 2. This article provides in particular in the aforementioned § 2: "In the cases mentioned in §n1, 4 to 6 , it states

and 6.1 GDPR) as well as the principle of minimization (article 5.1.c GDPR). II.1. Basis of lawfulness of processing (Article 5.1.a and 6.1 GDPR) 6. The

manner in accordance with Article 32 Paragraph 1 GDPR by the applicant in an appropriate manner in accordance with Article 32 Paragraph 1 GDPR to be secured

Paragraph 2 Letter c GDPR is not fulfilled. The material scope of application of the GDPR according to Article 2 GDPR is undoubtedly fulfilled in the present case

are not covered because of § 4(1) DSG in conjunction with Article 2(2)(c) GDPR. § 4(1) DSG provides that the GDPR applies in addition to the DSG. The DSB

basis: Art. 4, Art. 6 Paragraph 1 lit. f, Art. 51 Paragraph 1, Art. 57 Paragraph 1 lit. Basic Regulation, hereinafter: GDPR), OJ No. L 119 of 4.5.2016 p.

two-factor authentication, thus breaching Article 32(1)(b) GDPR and Article 32(1)(d), cf. Article 5(1)(f) GDPR. For this, the DPA fined the Parliament about €196

applicability of Article 22 GDPR for this reason. The Court reiterated the importance of Article 13 GDPR, Article 14 GDPR and Article 15 GDPR. Since the controller

complaint". 27 According to her statements in the entire legal proceedings, in particular in her letter of November 4, 2020, in which she stated that there was a

supervisory authorities. The Ministry may in regulations issue further provisions on internal control ». 4.4 In particular on the imposition of infringement