Search results

employment social networks and told him that his email was going to be deleted so that he would not receive more emails. TO To this, the complaining party responded

account and through other means and include in particular the tools of the so-called target group selection and searchability settings. 4As part of the

been corrected.] B E S C H E I D S P R U C H The data protection authority decides on the basis of the A ** Verkehrsbetriebe GmbH (Responsible), represented

Language: 24 EU Languages Original Source: Judgement Initial Contributor: so.h

an aggravating direction. h) in what way the supervisory authority became aware of the infringement, in particular if and if so the extent to which the data

data and the necessary protective measures, so that they can be included as part of the processing and so that the processing complies with the requirements

Sometimes it is also necessary to capture the accesses, doors or entrances, so that even if the camera is located inside the building, it is impossible not

of the granted conclusion periods, both the complainant (Ms. H.J.M.) and the parties (Ms. H.J.M.) submitted new elements that were not relevant to the subject

10/29/21, this Agency transferred the claim to the party complained against so that it could respond to it, in accordance with the provisions of article

lieu of the measures contemplated in Article 58, paragraph 2, letters a) to h) and j). When deciding to impose a fine administration and its amount in each

has acted on his behalf, including whether any individual is punished and h) the offender's financial capacity. " Section 46 of the Personal Data Act 2000

the time of the present resolution has not submitted a brief of allegations, so it is applicable indicated in article 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on

that he will not represent them, to provide us with their contact details so that in case we need to contact them directly. 2.5 On March 17, 2022, following

controller had stopped using Google Analytics short after the Schrems II ruling, so there was no violation of Chapter V of the GDPR. About a month after the "Schrems

article 65.4 of the LOPDGDD, a transfer of said claim to the claimed party, so that he proceeded to analyze it and inform this Agency within a month, of

controller did not answer to AEPD's first requirement, but it finally did so during the allegations phase and admitted a technical “mistake” on the wrong

provide reliable information at any time, the defendant should keep records so that they do not forget who was using the vehicle and when. Most importantly

understood by responsible for the treatment and in charge of the treatment. So we have, like: “7) “responsible for the treatment” or “responsible” is the

the complainant received an SMS from the defendant with advertising content, so the data subject filed a new complaint with the AEPD. After a request for

Database (Basisregistratie Personen) even though he was not authorized to do so; the candidate notary did not dedicate enough care to correct this and limit