Search results

no guarantee that this way It is ... I beg you to take action on your part so that these SMS. " And, among other things, it provides the following documentation:

that they had verified that the data of claimants 1 and 2 had been canceled so the incidents as resolved. On July 22, 2020, a new claim is received for them

requirement by the claimant, but the defendant did not answer nor made any action, so the AEPD started the corresponding sanction procedure. Without prejudice to

personal data of its customers in a notebook without having a legal basis to do so, and did not inform its data subjects of this data processing. A client of

dining rooms in relation to others such as showers, changing rooms, etc.). So there could be a need to monitor those places and even people's belongings

company for having processed personal data without having the legal basis to do so (Article 6(1) GDPR). The complainant stated that he called Naturgy's commercial

elections of 11/10/2019; that that chargeThey only offer it to affiliates so it follows that they still keep all theirdata.SECOND: Upon receipt of the

notification on the public notice board was authorised by virtue of Article 9(1)(h) of the Law on Horizontal Properties ("Ley de Propiedad Horizontal"). However

Appeal. (see, in any case, where there is reason to do so, a review or, where there is reason to do so, a re-investigation (cf. Naziris v. Naziris, n. 1. R

(art. 83.2 h) RGPD). - The continuing nature of the offence. The respondent had already received with Prior to the claim notices by the claimant so that adopt

private non-corporate phones. The data controller claimed that he did this so that employees could check whether their data were correct. A worker, whose

authority in this case, as they only examined the practice of Google Ireland in so far as it had an impact on the rights of data subjects residing in Hungary

rights (in hereinafter LOPDGDD), said claim was transferred to the Community, so that proceed to its analysis and inform this Agency within a period of one

period of ten days. The defendant did not answer any requirements of the AEPD, so the AEPD started the corresponding sanction procedure. Thus, the AEPD understood

the infringement; h) the manner in which the infringement became known to the supervisory authority, in particular whether, and if so to what extent, the

investigation or coordination with another supervisory authority is necessary; (…) (h) conduct investigations into the application of these classification, including

LOPDGDD), on January 25, 2022, said claim was transferred to the party claimed, so that it proceeded to its analysis and inform this Agency in the period of

when they have not been designated, transferred the claim to the two entities so that they could proceed with their analysis and respond to the complaining

call to the line on which certain requests are made sensitive operations, so that the owner client can authorize or not said operation before its execution

€) and acknowledging of guiltiness (36,000€). The defendant agreed to both, so it paid 36,000 € and the sanction procedure was closed by the AEPD. Share